Regulatory

Michael Drury and Tom McNeill write for Lexology’s Government Investigations: Global Overview

BCL partner Michael Drury and senior associate Tom McNeill author the England & Wales chapter of Lexology’s Getting The Deal Through – Government Investigations: Global Overview exploring the mechanisms that are available to resolve a government investigation.

Read more

Richard Reichman speaks to the Investors’ Chronicle on greenwashing

BCL partner, Richard Reichman discusses with Investors’ Chronicle the likely approach UK regulators will adopt in an attempt to stop financial institutions suspected of making misleading green claims. This comes after a raid of a German Asset Management firm last month, that prompted a criminal probe following allegations of so-called ‘greenwashing’ by the organisation.

Read more

John Binns writes for Thomson Reuters discussing cannabis and money laundering

Public attitudes toward cannabis have changed in recent years, however the UK law, has lagged, which paired with the requirements imposed by the UK’s money laundering laws on the regulated sector may result that the legitimate transactions may be turned away or blocked unnecessarily. BCL partner John Binns writes for Thomson Reuters discussing the challenges the cannabis and cannabidiol industry may present for those charged with identifying and reporting money laundry.

Read more

BCL’s Julian Hayes and Andrew Watson discuss the NIS Regulations with The Barrister Magazine

BCL’s Julian Hayes and Andrew Watson’s article ‘’Preparing for the worst but operating at our best – Reform of the NIS Regulations’’ has been published by The Barrister. In the article they discuss the regulations and look into the challenges for the reforms in the face of increased online threats.

Read more

John Binns writes for Thomson Reuters discussing crypto-assets under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

While crypto-assets are intangible, they can still be considered as ‘’property’’ and their value fluctuates significantly. They can also be used to commit fraud, to evade tax, to breach or circumvent financial sanctions, or to launder money. All of this means that they may have relevance to any of the various parts of Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.  BCL partner John Binns writes for Thomson Reuters exploring if crypto-assets can be seized under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

Read more
1 2 3 4 5 6 10