Serious and General Crime

To ban hate, first you must define it

Juries won’t convict without a clear understanding of when bad behaviour turns criminal, writes David Hardstaff for The Times

In what would be a surreal headline only a few years ago, it was recently announced that JK Rowling – author of the multimillion selling Harry Potter novels – will not be arrested under Scottish hate laws.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 came into effect at the beginning of this month and created offences of “stirring up hatred” in an effort to tackle crime against defined groups. The controversial offences sit in a growing category of laws that seek to criminalise behaviours considered contrary to modern progressive standards.

Many of these new offences look sensible at first glance – who would not want to crack down on “hatred”? Of course, behaviour that takes away someone’s independence and dignity should not be tolerated. There should not be a “rough sex” defence to serious violence (and there isn’t).

The problem is that several of these targeted behaviours are extremely difficult to define, and even more difficult to reach a consensus as to when the threshold for criminality is met.

This article was first published in The Times on 11 April 2024; to read the full article please click here.

Related articles

Crisis in the Courts: Barristers shun rape cases – David Hardstaff comments for Solicitors Journal

“Devastating” report reveals 64% of prosecutors and 66% of defense barristers refuse serious sexual assault cases, exacerbating backlog crisis

 

In a concerning revelation, a recent report from the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has unveiled a deepening crisis in the legal system, as the majority of barristers express their reluctance to take on rape and serious sexual assault cases. 

David emphasised that the chronic underfunding and neglect spanning decades lie at the core of this issue. This crisis not only contradicts the standards upheld by a progressive society but also undermines the government’s struggling Rape Review. An increase in miscarriages of justice is likely to follow.

This article was first published in Solicitors Journal on 14 February 2024; to read the full article please click here.

Related articles

Embracing the ‘Art of the Possible’ in Novel Food Regulation – David Hardstaff & John Binns write for Food Navigator

BCL partners David Hardstaff and John Binns have written for Food Navigator discussing how a high-profile investigation into banned muscle-building drugs highlights the issues with the novel food regime impacting the CBD industry.

Read more

Justice in a situation where justice is impossible?

Anne Sacoolas, a US citizen, has pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at a plea and case management hearing at the Old Bailey on 20 October 2022. The preliminary hearing took place at Westminster Magistrates Court on 28 September 2022, also remotely, where she was granted unconditional bail.  The CPS has accepted her plea despite having initially charged her with causing death by dangerous driving in December 2019. Sentencing has been adjourned to the end of November 2022, raising questions regarding the length and nature of the sentence and whether she will serve any custodial sentence in the UK, US or at all.

Read more
courtroom manslaughter lawyers in london

Confiscation Revisited: What to Do When the Prosecutor Comes Back for More

One of the lesser known, often poorly understood provisions of the confiscation regime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) is section 22, which provides an opportunity to the prosecutor to invite a ‘reconsideration of the available amount’. For many defendants who have been through the process, had an order made and in many cases satisfied that order in full, the first they have heard of that section is the letter informing them that such an application is to be made.

Read more
1 2 3