This provision would make organisations criminally responsible for offences committed by senior managers acting within the scope of their authority, regardless of whether there was an intention to benefit the company or preventative procedures were in place.
The article explores the legal and practical implications of this shift, from the historic challenges of attributing criminal intent to corporations, to the growing role of strict liability and the “failure to prevent” model. The piece examines whether the new approach truly promotes fairness and deterrence, or simply makes it easier to prosecute companies.
Read the full article here.

Tom McNeill
Partner
More like this

Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Comprehensive Proposals for Reform Under Scrutiny
In LexisNexis Corporate Crime's latest article, Partner John Binns and Associate Amelia Clegg explore the comprehensive proposals outlined in Part 1 of the Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, led by Sir Brian Leveson, former President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

Enforcement of Corporate Crime Laws in England & Wales
In this latest insight, BCL’s Michael Drury, Of counsel and Partner Tom McNeill examine the roles of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Competition & Markets Authority (CMA), HMRC, Insolvency Service, and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Tom McNeill Warns of Unintended Consequences in the Crime and Policing Bill
In an article for the New Law Journal, BCL partner Tom McNeill warns that the proposed Crime and Policing Bill could significantly expand corporate criminal liability through the introduction of an expanded ‘senior manager test’.







