The UK government has announced a new round of sanctions aimed at stopping Russia’s use of cryptocurrency networks and “shadow financial systems” to evade restrictions linked to the war in Ukraine.
The measures, introduced by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, target cryptocurrency exchanges, financial intermediaries and individuals accused of helping Moscow bypass Western sanctions through digital assets and cross-border payment systems. The sanctions also focus on the Kremlin-backed A7 network, which the UK says exploited foreign financial systems to channel funds into Russia’s war economy.
The latest sanctions introduced reflect growing concern among UK authorities about the increasing use of crypto-assets and opaque financial structures to conceal transactions and facilitate sanctions evasion. Targeted entities now face asset freezes, while UK businesses are prohibited from processing payments or maintaining correspondent banking relationships with them.
Commenting on the latest developments, BCL Partner John Binns noted that while sanctions designations are becoming an increasingly common enforcement tool, they are not always the most effective approach.
“New sanctions designations are an increasingly well-used weapon in the government's armory, but they are not necessarily the most effective,” he said. “Their nature - as a set of prohibitions that apply in the UK and to UK persons overseas - means they have a tendency to backfire.”
The announcement forms part of the UK’s wider sanctions strategy, with more than 3,300 Russian-linked targets sanctioned since the invasion of Ukraine began in 2022.
To read the full article, click here.
More like this

Chambers and Partners Sanctions 2024 Guide
The new Chambers and Partners UK Chapter of the Sanctions 2024 Guide, written by Partner John Binns, covers key jurisdictions, providing the latest information on regulatory and legal updates, delisting challenges, trade and export restrictions, litigation and arbitration and designation, compliance and circumvention.

The UK has sanctioned 7 Israeli settler outposts and organisations in the West Bank
On 15 October 2024, the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (“FCDO”) sanctioned three settler outposts and four Israeli organisations that it says “have supported and sponsored violence against communities in the West Bank”, under the UK’s global human rights sanctions regime.

Fortnightly Sanctions Round-Up: Lukoil Licences, Cyber Designations & Parliamentary Updates
This fortnight’s update highlights significant UK and international developments in sanctions and export controls, including new OFSI General Licences connected to Lukoil, fresh designations under the UK’s Russia and Cyber regimes, and parliamentary scrutiny concerning the use of interest accrued on the frozen proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club.

BCL Sanctions Round-Up: Key UK and Global Developments
This first 2026 edition considers evolving UK sanctions enforcement practice, government policy responses to sanctions evasion, and Parliamentary scrutiny of the UK’s Magnitsky-style regimes. It also examines developments relating to Venezuela, shadow fleet activity, crypto-assets and humanitarian licensing.

BCL Sanctions Update: Key UK Enforcement, Policy and Compliance Trends
This update highlights major UK and international sanctions developments, with a particular focus on the UK’s expanded Russia sanctions regime, evolving designation strategies, and key enforcement, policy and compliance considerations for businesses.

Sanctions and Export Controls Round-Up: Latest Enforcement and Policy Updates
BCLs latest sanctions round-up highlights key developments across UK and international sanctions regimes, including updates to the UK sanctions list, US oil-related sanctions measures, enforcement activity, and new UK guidance on sanctions compliance.

Hypothetical Control’ in UK Sanctions: Nonsense on Stilts?
One of the most difficult issues in UK sanctions is their application to companies that are ‘owned or controlled’ by a designated person. In BCL’s response to the government’s call for evidence on an aspect of these provisions, John Binns makes the case for a broader review.





















